🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial policy to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Politicians, safety advocates, and guardians are monitoring intently to see if this tactic will set a precedent for other nations.

Across Europe Movement

In Europe, a growing group of countries are considering comparable bans.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and apps are "stealing our children's youth". Legislation may be enacted soon.
• The Norwegian government is planning to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to protect young people from the "power of the AI".
• The Irish government is working on a online verification tool to authenticate the identity and age of social media account holders. The media minister have stated that an Australian-model ban could be "a potential tools on the table".
• In Spain, the president has urged parliament to enact a bill lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a comparable action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has urged parents to restrict their kids from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a non-binding motion demanding a ban for under-16s without parental consent is granted. While it highlights of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the move does not create enforceable legislation.

"An effective age barrier is a solid starting point," commented a leading parliamentarian supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Eye

In the UK, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is off the table" but stressing any action must be "supported by conclusive evidence".

Previously, interest gathered behind a bill to impose controls on social media use by minors, but it was eventually watered down. However, the government vowed to further research the issue.

Advocacy groups have expressed concerns. An organization founded by the family of a girl who died after being exposed to disturbing platform posts suggests that a strict age ban may not protect children and could create a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when young people reach the legal age.

"This ban is a reaction to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to create platforms and apps that are secure and age appropriate for young users," commented a leading peer.

The United States: A Fragmented Approach

Across America, legislation is mostly happening at the local level due to country-wide inaction.

• Utah mandates adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a law barring those below 14 from accessing social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a rule limiting minors to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra use needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed bills mandating parental consent for teenagers to set up social media profiles.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from various politicians to follow this example, a federal ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Global Outlook

Beyond Europe and the US, other states are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the access age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, world bodies strike a more measured stance. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The body highlights that the internet can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable children and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to invest in user protection.

As this worldwide conversation unfolds, the policies of the Australian government and others show that governments around the world are increasingly willing to stand by for platforms to make changes on their own.